The system was used for treatment.This case is reportable as a mdr due to the medical intervention of the adrenalin and hydrocortisone that was given to the patient and also due to the patient being hospitalized.Since this event is associated with the treatment, this mdr will be against the instrument.From the device perspective, there was no known device malfunction and no instrument issue was alleged by the customer.No service was requested by the customer for this adverse event.No product was returned therefore, a device service history review was performed.The customer has their own biomed who performs the service on this instrument.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, allergic reaction, shortness of breath, dizziness, swelling, nausea, and rash.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.The assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.No product was returned for investigation; therefore, it could not be determined if the product met specification based solely on the information provided by the customer.Complaints are monitored through tracking and trending.If a trend is detected, further investigation will be conducted.Adverse event terms: hypersensitivity, dyspnea, dizziness, swelling, nausea, and rash.(b)(4).
|
The customer called to report that a patient experienced a possible anaphylactic reaction during a treatment procedure.The customer stated that towards the end of the treatment procedure, the patient experienced dyspnea, dizziness, facial swelling, nausea and a rash on both his face and arms.The customer reported that at this time all of the drug treated cells had been reinfused back to the patient.The customer stated that the treatment was then ended with no blood returned to the patient.The customer reported that the patient was administered 300 ug of adrenalin as well as an iv of 200 mg hydrocortisone.The customer stated that the medications produced a rapid resolution of the event and the patient's symptoms resolved.The customer reported that the patient was admitted overnight and discharged the next day in stable condition.The customer stated that they were unclear as to the cause for the patient's reaction, but suspected it could have been due to the iron infusion that was given to the patient before the treatment procedure.No product was returned for investigation.
|