The reported complaint of the platform did not start compressions was confirmed during the review of the archive and functional testing.Following service, including replacement of the power distribution board (pdb), the top cover, encoder cover, motor cover, and head restraint brackets, the platform was further tested and passed all testing with no issue or faults observed.The device failed functional testing, due to ua29 (loss of brake connectivity) that occurred upon pressing of the start button, thus confirming the reported complaint.The fault was found to be due to the defective power distribution board (pdb).Visual inspection of the returned autopulse platform was performed and found top cover, encoder cover, motor cover and head restraint brackets damaged, thus confirming the reported complaint of the crack on the top cover and the left hand side of the platform is loose.The autopulse platform is a reusable as well as serviceable device and was manufactured on 01/2007.Therefore, this type of physical damages found during visual inspection are characteristics of normal wear and tear for the life of the device.The platform has exceeded its expected service life of 5 years.Review of archive data confirmed multiple ua29 errors on the reported event date, thus confirming the reported complaint.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint and there was no similar complaint reported for autopulse with serial number 12547.The death was not related to the autopulse device.The autopulse is used as an adjunct to manual cpr in cases of clinical death.If the autopulse did not start or unexpectedly stops compressions, rescuer should revert to manual cpr, which is the standard of care.For a trained user, changing from the autopulse to manual cpr can be made quickly, and patient's outcome should not be negatively impacted when compared to standard of care manual cpr.In this case, autopulse did not start and did not provide and compression.It is not known if the crew reverted to manual cpr.Rosc was not achieved.No detail was provided for the patient other than that the patient had been down for a long time.However, the patient's death is most likely caused by the underlying condition of the patient.
|
As reported, during patient call the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was power up and patient was aligned, however, the platform did not start compressions.According to the customer the patient had been down for a long time and did not achieve rosc.Customer stated that platform did not attributed to the patient death.In addition customer reported the device has a crack on the top cover and the left hand side of the platform is loose.
|