• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE PNEUMOCLEAR CO2 CONDITIONING INSUFFLATOR (AMERICAS); INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE PNEUMOCLEAR CO2 CONDITIONING INSUFFLATOR (AMERICAS); INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0620050050
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Improper Device Output (2953)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device manufacture date is not known at this time.However, should it become available, it will be provided in future reports.Additional information will be provided once the investigation has been completed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during surgery, the concentration for co2 on the insufflator was running higher than normal.The surgeon had to convert from a lap procedure to open surgery.The procedure was completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device manufacture date is not known.This insufflator was not received for evaluation at stryker endoscopy.This insufflator was received at oem-wom for evaluation.The reported failure "co2 running higher than normal for patient" cannot be confirmed.Alleged failure: co2 running higher than normal for patient probable root cause: the reported event could be not confirmed.There are no indications for a manufacturing issue.Increasing co2-levels are a clinical known side effect of co2-insufflation.Active ventilation of the patient helps to control and reduce the co2-level very well.Certain conditions have a negative effect on the co2-level and need to be considered during the procedure.E.G.Higher abdominal pressure, head down positioning, poor · patient relaxation, extra peritoneal insufflation (e.G.Hernia surgeries), reduced pulmonary function can promote high co2- levels.Investigation conclusion: the results of the investigation performed indicated that the returned pneumoclear plus co2 conditioning insufflator, catalog#0620050000 sn (b)(4) is working according to specification.The product was returned for investigation and the reported failure mode was not confirmed.The failure mode will be monitored for future reoccurrence.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during surgery, the concentration for co2 on the insufflator was running higher than normal.The surgeon had to convert from a lap procedure to open surgery.The procedure was completed successfully.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PNEUMOCLEAR CO2 CONDITIONING INSUFFLATOR (AMERICAS)
Type of Device
INSUFFLATOR, LAPAROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE
5900 optical court
san jose CA 95138
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ENDOSCOPY-SAN JOSE
5900 optical court
san jose CA 95138
Manufacturer Contact
ashley lower
5900 optical court
san jose, CA 95138
4087542000
MDR Report Key7115183
MDR Text Key94789122
Report Number0002936485-2017-01205
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K170784
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0620050050
Device Lot Number1707CE0035
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/17/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/13/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-