• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number P612
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).(b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer received a questionable high crep2 creatinine plus ver.2 result for one sample from a patient.The customer had three serum tubes drawn from the patient which were labeled with two different samples ids.All three samples were processed via the pvt (p471/p612) preanalytic system and two of the samples were tested on cobas 8000 c (701) module serial number (b)(4).One sample with (b)(6) (sample b) had a creatinine result of 314 umol/l and the sample with (b)(6) (sample c) had a result of 177 umol/l.Both results were reported outside of the laboratory and were questioned by the physician.There was no allegation of an adverse event.The creatinine reagent lot number was 283369.The expiration date was requested but was not provided the laboratory checked the labeling of the tubes, all other results for the samples, and the blood type of the samples.The customer was certain both of these samples were from the same patient.On (b)(6) 2017 the laboratory retested all three samples with both crep2 creatinine plus ver.2 and creatinine jaffe methods as part of troubleshooting.The results showed the same discrepancy for the one suspect sample tube (sample b).The customer suspected the sample tube had been contaminated.The field service representative checked the instrument and performed minor adjustments.Afterward, the instrument performed within specification.Review of the provided reaction data confirmed the contamination and excluded interference from the patient's myeloma.As no other analytes were affected, a general patient or analyzer issue was not suspected.As only one of the samples was affected, an interference with the patient's medication or sample probe carry over could be excluded.The source of the contamination was unknown, but was likely the pvt (p471/p612) preanalytic system.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Further investigation ruled out contamination and was unable to find a definitive root cause.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS P 612 PRE-ANALYTICAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM  68305
Manufacturer (Section G)
HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP.
882 ichige hitachinaka
na
ibaraki 312-8 504
JA   312-8504
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key7117014
MDR Text Key95741521
Report Number1823260-2017-02921
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JQP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberP612
Device Catalogue NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/27/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-