• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK RIGIDFIX CURVE ST ACL PLA CROSS PIN SYSTEM; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK RIGIDFIX CURVE ST ACL PLA CROSS PIN SYSTEM; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 213013
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/28/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The affiliate reported via email that the trocar got stuck into the cannula.No aes reported.Also, the laser marker was in a wrong position.No aes reported.There was no adverse patient consequences.The following additional information was received via email from the affiliate on (b)(6) 2017: the device was used in an acl procedure.The procedure was completed by using a new device and there was a five minute delay in the case.The trocar welded while being introduced into the cannula.The marker placement was wrong on the push rod assembly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
In the reported event, the product code has multiple components associated with it.Two of those components had complaints reported on them- the trocar assembly and the pusher rod assembly.Only one sleeve of the trocar assembly and the pusher rod assembly was received back for evaluation.The trocar assembly: per the reported complaint, the trocar got welded into the cannula.However, the entire trocar assembly was not returned and hence was unavailable for physical evaluation.Only one sleeve of the trocar assembly was returned for evaluation.This sleeve looked to be in good condition.No apparent anomalies were observed.The reported issue cannot be confirmed.A review of the device history record indicated that this batch of product was released through an unrelated non-conformance with no link to the reported issue and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.We cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any type for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.The push rod assembly: per the reported complaint, the laser marker was in the incorrect position of the push rod assembly.Photos of the complaint device were received when the complaint was first reported.The photos of the device showed that the laser marking was in the correct location as reference to the released drawing.The complaint device (pusher rod assembly) was received and evaluated.The received complaint device was compared to the released drawing of the pusher rod assembly.It was observed that the laser marking was in fact in the correct position per the released drawing.Visually, the pusher rod looked to be in good condition and no anomalies or discrepancies could be observed.Hence, we could not confirm the reported complaint.No root cause could be determined as the device was found to be conforming to the released drawing.A review of the device history record revealed the lot was linked to a non-conformance for the push rod assembled with the wrong orientation to the handle.No non-conformance was found with this lot and it was dispositioned for release.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no complaints of any type for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The affiliate reported via email that the trocar got stuck into the cannula.No aes reported.Also, the laser marker was in a wrong position.No aes reported.There was no adverse patient consequences.The following additional information was received via email from the affiliate on 11-29-17: the device was used in an acl procedure.The procedure was completed by using a new device and there was a five minute delay in the case.The trocar welded while being introduced into the cannula.The marker placement was wrong on the push rod assembly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RIGIDFIX CURVE ST ACL PLA CROSS PIN SYSTEM
Type of Device
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS SARL
puits godet 20
neuchatel CH 20 00
SZ   CH 2000
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer lawrence
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089776860
MDR Report Key7118021
MDR Text Key95743192
Report Number1221934-2017-10711
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130105
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/31/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/29/2020
Device Catalogue Number213013
Device Lot NumberL320069
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer08/31/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/31/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-