• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number MICL12.6
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Pain (1994); Retinal Detachment (2047); Vitreous Hemorrhage (2143); Halo (2227); Vitrectomy (2643); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/16/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2017 an icl was removed due to retinal detachment.Additional information has been requested but none has been forthcoming.If additional information is received, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reporter indicated that the surgeon implanted a 12.6mm micl12.6 of -12.0 diopter implantable collamer lens in the patient's right eye on (b)(6) 2017.On (b)(6) 2017 the lens was explanted due to retinal tear leading to its subsequent detachment.The patient also had elevated iop, narrowing of angle and experienced "some halos and floating lights".Additional peripheral iridectomy brought the elevated iop back to pre-op level and the enlargement of peripheral iridotomy performed increased depth.Vitrectomy was also performed.The surgeon reported that the patient is "currently aphakic will need lens implant".(b)(4).Method: no additional similar complaint type event(s) within associated lots were found.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reporter indicated that the surgeon implanted a 12.6mm micl12.6 of -12.0 diopter implantable collamer lens in the patient's right eye on (b)(6) 2017.On (b)(6) 2017 the lens (and natural lens) was explanted due to retinal tear leading to its subsequent detachment.Laser retinopexy was performed followed by pneumatic cryopexy only to have the curtain in patient's vision return.Vitrectomy performed led to vitreous hemorrhage.A second retinal tear was noticed leading to a second vitrectomy, scleral buckle and "lensectomy" or explant of the micl and natural lens.The patient also had elevated iop, narrowing of angle, pain and experienced "some halos and floating lights".Additional peripheral iridectomy bought the elevated iop back to pre-op level and the enlargement of peripheral iridotomy performed increased depth.The surgeon reported that the patient is "currently aphakic will need lens implant".(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL)
Type of Device
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
1911 walker avenue
monrovia CA 91016
Manufacturer (Section G)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
1911 walker avenue
monrovia CA 91016
Manufacturer Contact
cynthia thai
1911 walker avenue
monrovia, CA 91016
MDR Report Key7119246
MDR Text Key94923466
Report Number2023826-2017-01886
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030016
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Model NumberMICL12.6
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/20/2017
01/25/2018
02/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/18/2018
02/09/2018
02/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age35 YR
-
-