• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310020
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that blood backed up in the burr.The target lesion was located in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus and a rotawire were selected for use.During procedure, it was noted that the rotaglide stopped running through the burr.Furthermore, blood backed up into the burr and the burr failed to advance.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.However, device analysis revealed that the rotawire was unable to be removed from the burr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotalink burr catheter for the complaint device; however, the advancer for the complaint was not returned.Following analysis, the handshake connection, sheath, coil, and burr were microscopically and visually inspected.There was blood in the sheath.The annulus of the burr was flared, damaged, and not rounded.The damage to the annulus is consistent with damage caused by the rotating burr coming into contact with the guidewire during use, leading to the damaged annulus.An attempt to remove the rotawire was unsuccessful.The burr and wire were soaked for 5 minutes in hot water and the devices were still unable to be separated.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design & manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-12804.It was further reported that the burr became stuck on the rotawire.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-12804.It was further reported that the burr became stuck on the rotawire.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7122743
MDR Text Key95463234
Report Number2134265-2017-11997
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2019
Device Model NumberH749236310020
Device Catalogue Number23631-002
Device Lot Number0020899820
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2017
12/11/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/09/2018
01/10/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/19/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
-
-