• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Retention (2119); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Electric Shock (2554); Intraoperative Pain (2662)
Event Date 08/24/2009
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim.It was reported that the patient had a problem with the device that if they turned it up enough to do what it was supposed to do it caused a problem with their foot where they would get shocked in their foot and their toes would curl up.It was noted that it had occurred from the beginning.The patient stated they had worked with manufacturer¿s representatives (rep) numerous times, but they were never able to get it fixed so the therapy had never really worked for them.The patient noted that the odd thing was that the trial worked great for them.The patient reported they would play around with their programmer for hours trying to make adjustments, but it didn¿t help and they ended up giving up on the therapy a ¿few months or so¿ after getting the device.It was reported that the patient started to think that getting the device was a bad idea and the implant surgery was kind of a painful one.The patient stated they were disappointed that the therapy didn¿t work for them and they still had the same problem.The patient clarified that it was not like bladder leaking, but a problem where they couldn¿t go pee and they would get infections because of that.The patient noted they did not know the specific dates of the infections.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider for possible reprogramming.The patient stated they thought they would try to have their healthcare provider invite a rep in.No further complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7137550
MDR Text Key95465639
Report Number3004209178-2017-26422
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994287724
UDI-Public00613994287724
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2010
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Date Device Manufactured05/18/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age53 YR
-
-