• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310020
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/06/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion and burr detachment occurred.The 99% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified proximal right coronary artery (rca).A 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus was selected for use.During the procedure, a non bsc balloon catheter failed to cross the target lesion.The non bsc balloon was then replaced with a 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus and a rotawire and the rotalink¿ plus was used initially at 190,000rpm.However, it was noted that the burr became stuck in the narrow stenosis of the target lesion.The physician removed his foot from the foot pedal and it did not rotate at first.Then, the physician tried to remove the burr and the rotawire together with the non bsc guide catheter by pulling for 5 to 10 minutes with force.When it was taken outside the patient's body, it was noted that the joint part of the burr and shaft got separated.The rotawire floppy remained in the boundary of the radiopaque marker and opaque and the burr was in free condition along the rotawire.The device was able to be successfully retrieved.The procedure was not completed and treatment was to be prescribed again.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, and burr were microscopically and visually examined.The coil was received broken and stretched.The burr was detached from the coil and received on the rotawire.The burr was not able to be removed from the rotawire, as the wire could not be removed from the rotablator due to the damage associated with the rotawire.Inspection of the burr revealed that the annulus was damaged and flared.The damage to the annulus is consistent to interaction with the rotawire during rotation.There was also damage to the bottom of the burr and there was portion of the coil still attached inside the burr.It¿s probable that the damage to the coil and bottom of the burr was associated to pulling on the device when the burr was stuck in the lesion for 5 to 10 minutes with force, as reported.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is user / use error as there was an act or omission of an act that resulted in a different medical device response than intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user.The dfu states: "recheck the rational speed reading to verify that the rotation rate is appropriate for the burr size and lesion type, and adjust the operating speed.1.25 ¿ 2.0mm burrs 160,000 up to 180,000 rpm¿.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-00367.It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion and burr detachment occurred.The 99% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified proximal right coronary artery (rca).A 1.25mm rotalink plus was selected for use.During the procedure, a non bsc balloon catheter failed to cross the target lesion.The non bsc balloon was then replaced with a 1.25mm rotalink plus and a rotawire and the rotalink plus was used initially at 190,000rpm.However, it was noted that the burr became stuck in the narrow stenosis of the target lesion.The physician removed his foot from the foot pedal and it did not rotate at first.Then, the physician tried to remove the burr and the rotawire together with the non bsc guide catheter by pulling for 5 to 10 minutes with force.When it was taken outside the patient's body, it was noted that the joint part of the burr and shaft got separated.The rotawire floppy remained in the boundary of the radiopaque marker and opaque and the burr was in free condition along the rotawire.The device was able to be successfully retrieved.The procedure was not completed and treatment was to be prescribed again.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7137773
MDR Text Key95666173
Report Number2134265-2017-13000
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729316411
UDI-Public08714729316411
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2018
Device Model NumberH749236310020
Device Catalogue Number23631-002
Device Lot Number19523889
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/06/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-