(b)(4).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The complaint's unit was received separated in three sections; however, the sections broken were inspected under magnification, and there are not evidence of fragmentation or disintegration.Moreover, the flexible cannula was received damaged (severely kinked).Additionally, residues were noted on the flexible cannula.Dimensional inspection was done and revealed that the catheter working length is within specification.A mandrel 0.038 inches was inserted through the catheter sections, and it passed properly without resistance.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design and manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on (b)(6) 2017.It was reported that the wire was stuck in the catheter.A 8.3/22 expel ureteral stent system was selected for use.During procedure, the wire got stuck in expel catheter.No patient complications reported.However, device analysis revealed that the catheter was separated in three sections.It was further reported that the plastic obturator was inserted into the nephro-ureteral stent over a guide wire and the whole system was placed inside the patient without any problem.Difficulty withdrawing the plastic obturator from the stent was encountered.It was then noted that the shaft became elongated and broke.The whole system was withdrawn and replaced with another stent.The luer was not separated from the shaft.It was possible to withdraw the plastic obturator after it had elongated, in which case the stent was left in place.The plastic obturator was not kinked while inserting.
|