Although it is unknown if the device caused or contributed to the event or not, we are filing this report for notification purposes.(b)(6) hosp, (b)(6).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2009, the patient was pre-operatively diagnosed with recurrent lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis, l3-4 and l4-5, status post previous l2-3 fusion and underwent the following the procedures: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, left l3-4 and left l4-5, using 8mm peek transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion spacers packed with rhbmp2.Gill procedure, l2-3 and l3-4 and l4-5 with lateral mass fusion using matchsticks, allograft at l2 to l5.Removal of old pedicle screws and rods, l2-3.Placement of new pedicle screws and rods, l2, l3, l4 and l5, using 6.5 x 50mm cannulated screws, 100mm curved rods and two 40mm crosslinks.Reduction of spondylolisthesis, open, l3-4 and l4-5.Lateral recess decompression with foraminotomies, l3-4 and l4-5 bilaterally.As per op-notes,¿ the discs were then cleaned out with digger rongeurs until all endplates were removed.The deep portions of the discs were irrigated with antibiotic solution and packed with rhbmp2, autograft.An 8 mm peek spacer was packed with rhbmp2 and boomeranged across the midline at both levels.While this was occurring, distraction was carried upward reducing the spondylolisthesis and prior to this, gill procedures had been done to release the facets.¿ the patient tolerated the procedure well without any intraoperative complications.
|