• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310040
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/08/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-13098.It was reported that the tip of the rotawire was rotating inside the blood vessel.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified left main trunk.A 1.75mm rotalink¿ plus and a 330cm rotawire¿ were selected for use.During the procedure, a 0.014" non bsc guidewire was advanced to the target lesion and then a non bsc microcatheter was inserted and replaced with the rotawire.When the rotawire was advanced inside the guiding catheter in order to reach the 1.75mm rotaburr up to lesion by dynaglide, it was noted under fluoroscopy that the tip of the rotawire was found rotating in the blood vessel.Afterwards, the rotawire was slightly withdrawn and was advanced again through dynaglide mode.Ablation was then performed and was completed with the same rotalink and the same rotawire.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Returned product consisted of the rotablator rotalink plus device.The brake button, advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil and burr were microscopically and visually inspected.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged and not rounded.The damage to the annulus is consistent with damage caused by contact with the rotawire during use.The brake button was received in the as-manufactured position.The brake button was tested and it was able to be pressed and released with no issues.The guidewire used in the procedure was not returned for product analysis, so functional testing was completed with a test rotawire.The rotawire was not able to be inserted in the annulus of the burr due to the damage, so the advancer and burr catheter were detached and the rotawire was inserted into the handshake connection of the advancer.Functional testing was performed by connecting the advancer device to the rotablator control console system and the brake was tested with the rotawire.The brake and rotawire worked properly with no issues.The advancer was opened and the brake was examined.There was no damage or irregularities to the brake or the inside the advancer at the brake location.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is not confirmed - returned as there was no evidence of either the alleged issue(s) or any defect which could have contributed to the event.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-13098.It was reported that the tip of the rotawire was rotating inside the blood vessel.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified left main trunk.A 1.75mm rotalink¿ plus and a 330cm rotawire¿ were selected for use.During the procedure, a 0.014" non bsc guidewire was advanced to the target lesion and then a non bsc microcatheter was inserted and replaced with the rotawire.When the rotawire was advanced inside the guiding catheter in order to reach the 1.75mm rotaburr up to lesion by dynaglide, it was noted under fluoroscopy that the tip of the rotawire was found rotating in the blood vessel.Afterwards, the rotawire was slightly withdrawn and was advanced again through dynaglide mode.Ablation was then performed and was completed with the same rotalink and the same rotawire.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7141703
MDR Text Key95795766
Report Number2134265-2017-13099
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729228370
UDI-Public08714729228370
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/09/2019
Device Model NumberH749236310040
Device Catalogue Number23631-004
Device Lot Number0021231792
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/04/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/23/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/09/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-