Model Number BA28-80/I20-40 |
Device Problems
Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Collapse (1099); Leak/Splash (1354)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 11/27/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The devices involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation, they remain implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent and a suprarenal aortic extension.A routine follow up showed the patient had a type 3a endoleak.The physician elected to implant a non-endologix cook device to seal the endoleak.The current patient status is unknown and was not reported to endologix.There have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
Based on the information received at the completion of the clinical evaluation, there were substantial reported evidence that supported the following case event.It was confirmed that patient had a type 3a endoleak, main body buckling, and a secondary endovascular procedure done on (b)(6) 2017.In addition, clinical also found a complete component separation; cuff migration (1.5 cm); 3b of the cuff and superior stent cage dilation (28%).This will be reported in a separate report.The patient was discharged home in stable condition.No further information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the information received at the completion of the clinical evaluation, there were substantial reported evidence that supported the following case event.It was confirmed that patient had a type 3a endoleak, buckling of the main body, and a secondary endovascular procedure done on (b)(6) 2017.In addition, clinical also found a complete component separation; cuff migration (1.5 cm); 3b of the cuff and superior stent cage dilation (28%).Will be reported in a separate report.Cumulative knowledge informed by past assessments of similar complaints was applied to a review of the available medical information.The most likely cause of the compromised stent integrity of the cuff (breached), and the main body (superior stent margin) was the use of the strata material in combination with a progressive loss of overlap, likely cause by an extreme aortic and an iliac tortuosity.The complete component separation resulted in a loss of seal.The resultant component remodeling likely caused the stent migration and near complete buckling of the main body stent.Intra-operatively, the buckling precluded the physician from performing a successful reline and an additional surgical femoral to femoral bypass (and an aui procedure) was needed to repair the system.The patient was discharged home in stable condition.A review of manufacturing lot confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.The devices remain implanted in the patient and were not returned and no evaluation was completed.These types of events will be monitored and trended as part of the quality system.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|