It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The indication for the implant was deep vein thrombosis (dvt) with a history or gastro-intestinal bleeding.The filter was placed without incident and the procedure was well tolerated by the patient.The information received indicated that as a direct and proximate result of the placement of the filter, the patient suffered injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.Additional information contained in the patient profile form indicated that the patient is reported to continue to experience pain, swelling and varicose veins at the implant site.The form also indicted that the filter is unable to be retrieved although there are no known recorded retrieval attempts.There is currently no additional information available.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Blood clots that develop in the veins of the leg or pelvis, may be related to a condition called deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Large thrombus within the vena cava or lower extremities may impede perfusion and cause venous insufficiency.With time, high pressure in the leg veins due to venous insufficiency of either the superficial or deep veins (or both) can cause leakage of blood out of the capillary beds, resulting in swelling of the legs.Given the limited information available for review, a relation between the device and the event could not be determined.Pain does not represent a device malfunction.At this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.As a direct and proximate result of the placement of the filter, the patient suffered injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.The following additional information received per the medical records indicates the filter was placed for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (dvt.) the patient is reported to continue to experienced pain, swelling and varicose veins at the implant site.The patient profile form indicates that the filter is unable to be retrieved although there are no known recorded retrieval attempts.The medical records indicate the index procedure was tolerated without difficulty and the patient was discharged in good and stable condition.
|