• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL); PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number VTICMO13.2
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Cyst(s) (1800); Blurred Vision (2137); Halo (2227); Discomfort (2330); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 10/09/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This product is manufactured in the u.S.But not marketed in the u.S.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The reporter indicated that the surgeon implanted a 13.2 mm vticmo13.2 implantable collamer lens, -1.5/+3.5/170 (sphere/cylinder/axis), into the patient's left eye (os) on (b)(6) 2017.The surgeon reports excessive vault, lens rotation, refractive surprise, significant reduction of irido-corneal angles (ica) (angle closure), haloes, visual discomfort, and anterior chamber irrigation/evacuation of remaining visco/fluids.Also reported is surgical enlargement/addition of new pi, low bcva and ucva, and lens repositioning.The surgeon states that "probably the lens is too big for the eye" but believes that the visual problems of the patient are not related to the lens but to the cornea.He believes that changing the icl will not solve the visual discomfort and that the lens is not doing any harm to the patient.The lens remains implanted.The patient is "not happy with his visual acuity.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The surgeon noted that "the iris cyst was not suspected before the surgery.The suspicion was risen after the first by the fact that the vault was uneven and that with dilation always gets more even and with a normal height.And the cyst suspicion was even stronger after the second surgery since re-accommodation of the icl did not change the behavior of the lens." work order search: no similar complaint type events were reported for units within the same lot.Conclusion code: previous code is not applicable, keratoconus is no longer considered a contraindication.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS (ICL)
Type of Device
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
1911 walker avenue
monrovia CA 91016
Manufacturer (Section G)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
1911 walker avenue
monrovia CA 91016
Manufacturer Contact
cynthia thai
1911 walker avenue
monrovia, CA 91016
6263037902
MDR Report Key7152455
MDR Text Key95971427
Report Number2023826-2017-01962
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAR
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2020
Device Model NumberVTICMO13.2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/30/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/28/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/15/2018
03/07/2018
03/13/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/15/2018
03/07/2018
03/13/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
-
-