The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the cuff detached from the catheter was confirmed, and the cause appears to be use related.An 8 fr groshong single-lumen catheter was returned for investigation.The catheter was received with the stylet in the lumen.The cuff was received separate from the catheter.Dry blood residue was observed throughout the cuff fibers.Adhesive residue remained where the cuff had been positioned.The cuff weave pattern was visible in the adhesive that remained on the catheter, which indicates that the cuff had been adhered to the tubing.A tactual investigation revealed elastic weakness in the 8 fr tubing between the 24 and 25 cm depth marks, which indicates that the catheter was stretched in the area of the cuff.The ifu indicates to not use the catheter if there is any evidence of mechanical damage.The condition of the returned sample indicates that the product was used.The ifu cautions that the catheter must not be forced during tunneling.The ifu states, ¿gently holding the catheter distal to the cuff while pulling the tunneler and catheter through subcutaneous tunnel should result in smooth passage of the cuff(s) through the subcutaneous tunnel.¿ a lot history review (lhr) of rebp0596 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|