• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGTRS45AXT
Device Problems Air Leak (1008); Misfire (2532); Separation Failure (2547); Failure to Form Staple (2579)
Patient Problem Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 11/08/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter: occurred during a lobectomy.The doctor felt he had fully fired the reload, but the buttress material was not fully cut until the end and there was 1/4 of the staples that did not deploy.The staple line was incomplete.There was further stapling needed due to the buttress material still being attached to the new staple line and the reload.An attempt was made to pull the two apart which caused tissue damage to the lung.Additional staple reloads were used to secure air leak.The health of this patients lungs were in very poor condition.The tissue was very friable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of one device.Visual inspection of the returned product noted that the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged.The jaws were open.Staple pushers were visible at the 1cm cut line.Functionally the reload was loaded into a post market vigilance instrument, the interlock was over ridden, and the reload was applied to test media.All remaining staples were placed, and test media was cleanly transected.Records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all manufacturer¿s quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.Replication of the partial fire condition with interlock engagement may occur when the firing handle has not been completely cycled.If the instrument return knobs are retracted at any point once the firing cycle has begun, the loading unit will engage into safety interlock and prevent further attempts to fire by ceasing the placement of staples and tissue transection, and prevent patient harm.Should new information become available, the file will be re-opened and the investigation summary will be amended as appropriate.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott road
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott road
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
sharon
60 middletown ave
north haven, CT 06473
2034925267
MDR Report Key7157689
MDR Text Key96214582
Report Number1219930-2018-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160176
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/24/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGTRS45AXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGTRS45AXT
Device Lot Number7271099NH
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/04/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/13/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/02/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/16/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-