The device was not received for analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion is anticipated procedural complication as the event is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure noted within the directions for use, and/or device labeling.(b)(4).
|
Same case as mdr id# 2134265-2017-12853 & 2134265-2017-12854.It was reported the burr became stuck in the lesion, patient complications arose, and the patient expired.The stenosed target lesion was located in the left anterior descending artery (lad).A 1.50mm rotalink¿ burr, rotawire¿, and rotalink¿ advancer were selected for use.During the procedure, the burr became stuck in the lesion resulting in a stall.Atrial fibrillation occurred and the lad vessel ruptured.The physician attempted to remove the burr, however, the attempt failed.The patient subsequently expired.
|