• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COLOPLAST A/S ALTIS KIT; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COLOPLAST A/S ALTIS KIT; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Model Number 5196501022
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information of conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
According to the available information, dr.Encountered a problem when implanting an altis mesh.Indeed, the tip of one of the introduction device was broken during the anchoring of the mesh.The tip remained in the patient's body.Need to open a 2nd set for implantation of the mesh.Assitional information received indicated the tip is still in patient, surgeon found it touchy to remove.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up mdr is created to document the evaluation of the returned device: one left introducer was received for evaluation.Most the introducer tip was missing.The base of the tip showed signs of significant bending prior to breaking.No further anomalies were noted.According to the available information, the tip of one of the introducers was broken during the anchoring of the altis mesh.The tip remains in the patient's body.Quality's observations are consistent with the reported event.The instructions for use instructs users to keep the introducer against the patient's body and parallel with the ipsilateral ischiopubic ramus when advancing the anchor through the obturator membrane.If the introducer is not parallel with the ramus, the tip of the introducer may contact the bone and cause breakage of the tip of the introducer.Therefore, quality concludes that the root cause of the event is user error due to the introducer not being held parallel to the ramus during implantation of the anchor.This complaint was forwarded to the contract manufacturer (cm) for review.The cm reviewed the manufacturing records for this device and confirmed that there were no discrepancies that would have contributed to this complaint and verified that the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.Management routinely reviews events such as this and monitors complaint levels.Additionally, events of this type are captured in the product risk documentation.Based on this information, and because the device is not available for evaluation, no further corrective action is required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTIS KIT
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COLOPLAST A/S
holtedam 1
humlebaek, 3050
DA  3050
Manufacturer (Section G)
COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
1601 west river road north
minneapolis MN 55411
Manufacturer Contact
stephanie perryman
1601 west river road north
minneapolis, MN 55411
6123024983
MDR Report Key7165573
MDR Text Key96443000
Report Number2125050-2018-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PAH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P000006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model Number5196501022
Device Catalogue Number5196501022
Device Lot Number5559448
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/17/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/13/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/13/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-