• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION Back to Search Results
Model Number A34-34/C100-O20
Device Problems Hole In Material (1293); Leak/Splash (1354); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problems Aneurysm (1708); Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 12/07/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation, they remain implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent and a suprarenal aortic extension.A follow up showed the patient had aneurysm sac growth and a possible type 3b endoleak in the proximal extension.There was no contrast noted outside the graft, however, the proximal extension was dilated to 40mm.The physician is planning to reline the initial implanted devices.A secondary intervention has not been carried out or reported to the endologix.The patient status is currently unknown and not initially reported.There have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information received at the completion of the clinical evaluation, there were substantial reported evidence that supported the following case event.It was confirmed that patient had a sac growth.The reported type 3b endoleak of the cuff was refuted and there was no overt angiography evidence of type 3b endoleak (type v endoleak), and stent cage was found to be only 13% stretched.A secondary was performed on (b)(6) 2017.Cumulative knowledge informed by past assessments of similar complaints was applied to a review of the available medical information.The most likely cause of the proximal loss of seal was the off label neck anatomy, the most likely cause of the stent cage dilation (13%) of the cuff stent was the use of strata material.To date there has been no reports of further negative patient sequelae.A review of the manufacturing lot confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.The devices remain implanted in the patient and were not returned and no evaluation will be completed.These types of events will be monitored and trended as part of the quality system.Device code: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
victor arellano
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984671
MDR Report Key7166466
MDR Text Key96444451
Report Number2031527-2018-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2015
Device Model NumberA34-34/C100-O20
Device Lot Number1054959-019
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/07/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-