Model Number BA28-70/I20-30 |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Stretched (1601)
|
Patient Problems
Aneurysm (1708); Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 12/09/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The devices involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation, they remain implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent, a suprarenal aortic extension and a limb stent.A follow up showed a loss of overlap with no endoleak.The physician proactively relined the initial implant with ovation devices to prevent additional stent movement.The final patient status was not initially reported.There have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
Clinical was able to confirm the secondary repair on (b)(6) 2017.However, clinical refuted the cuff migration as reported, rather there was no migration observed.In addition, clinical noted sac growth; superior stent margin dilation of main body 36.6mm (30%); and left access complication (seroma), which required a surgical intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the information received at the completion of the clinical evaluation, there were substantial reported evidence that supported the following case event.Clinical was able to confirm the secondary repair on (b)(6) 2017.However, clinical refuted the cuff migration as reported, rather there was no migration observed.In addition, clinical noted sac growth; superior stent margin dilation of main body 36.6mm (30%); and left access complication (seroma), which required a surgical intervention.Cumulative knowledge informed by past assessments of similar complaints was applied to a review of the available medical information.The most likely cause of the loss of seal was the aortic remodeling, the loss of overlap which was exacerbated by the dilation of the main body stent (stretched 30%).The patient was discharged home in the stable condition on the third post-operative day.A review of the manufacturing lot confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.The devices remain implanted in the patient and will not returned and no evaluation will be completed.These types of events will be monitored and trended as part of the quality system.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|