• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number PP6-530-0027
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Corneal Scar (1793); Inflammation (1932); Tissue Damage (2104); Loss of Vision (2139); Visual Disturbances (2140)
Event Date 10/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The corneal inlay had extruded through the flap and was not available for analysis.The device history record review of the manufacturing lot for this device was performed and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings related to the reported issue.Corneal melting, corneal scarring, corneal inflammation, loss of vision, and increased visual symptoms are listed in the device labeling as known potential risks.Complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The subject was enrolled in the u.S.Ide clinical trial and underwent implantation of the investigational raindrop corneal inlay in the left eye on (b)(6) 2013.Four years postoperatively the subject was diagnosed by an ophthalmologist (not the study investigator) with (b)(6) over the inlay and was prescribed steroids and antiviral medications for 2 weeks with no resolution.The patient was later seen by the ide investigator who did not confirm the diagnosis of (b)(6), but instead reported focal dense central scarring anterior and posterior to the inlay with melting of the stroma and disruption of the epithelium directly over the inlay with very poor vision.The patient was prescribed steroids and the inlay was scheduled to be explanted.During the intervention, the inlay was not removed because it had extruded through the flap.Additional information is being requested.In addition to the report from the study investigator, the study subject also contacted the manufacturer and reported experiencing ocular irritation, sensitivity to light, and eye tearing.The patient denies having a medical history of (b)(6), but disclosed he has allergies and admitted to eye rubbing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key7181212
MDR Text Key96934169
Report Number3005956347-2018-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
G090149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/01/2013
Device Model NumberPP6-530-0027
Device Lot Number002354
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/10/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-