• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PLA360400
Device Problems Break (1069); Off-Label Use (1494); Component or Accessory Incompatibility (2897); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/30/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi: (b)(4).The review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.According to the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), the safety and effectiveness of the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis have not been evaluated in patients with pending rupture or ruptured aneurysms.Additionally, the safety and effectiveness of the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis have not been evaluated in the revision of previously placed stent grafts.The ifu also states: ¿do not continue advancing any portion of the delivery system if resistance is felt during advancement of the guidewire, sheath, or catheter.Stop and assess the cause of resistance.Vessel or catheter damage may occur.¿ ¿do not attempt to withdraw any undeployed endoprosthesis through the introducer sheath.The sheath and catheter must be removed together.¿ ¿do not continue to withdraw the delivery catheter if resistance is felt during removal through the introducer sheath.Forcibly withdrawing the delivery catheter through the introducer sheath when resistance is encountered has resulted in adverse events including catheter separation and reintervention.¿.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017, a patient underwent treatment of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa) secondary to a proximal type i endoleak on a previously implanted non-gore device.It was reported that during advancement of a gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis aortic extender component, the device had difficulty advancing over the guidewire past the overlap of the previously implanted non-gore device.According to the report, a decision was made to remove the device and withdraw the device into the sheath.No resistance was reportedly noted during withdrawal.It was reported a cutdown was then performed on the femoral artery, and the sheath and partially deployed device were removed from the guidewire via the cut down opening.It was reported the sheath was then reinserted into the femoral artery, at which point it was determined the leading olive from the aortic extender component had detached and remained within the distal limb of the previously implanted non-gore device.According to the report, a snare catheter was used to successfully remove the detached leading olive.Three aortic extender components were then reportedly implanted for proximal extension on the non-gore device.It was reported final angiography showed complete exclusion of the ruptured aaa with no evidence of endoleak, and the patient left the operating room in stable condition.Additional information has been requested.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during advancement of a gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis aortic extender component, the device had difficulty advancing over the guidewire past the overlap of the previously implanted non-gore device.According to the report, a decision was made to remove the device and withdraw the device into the sheath.No resistance was reportedly noted during withdrawal.According to the report, the aortic extender component partially deployed during attempted withdrawal of the device into the sheath.It was reported a cutdown was then performed on the femoral artery, and the partially deployed device was removed from the guidewire via the cutdown opening.It was reported the sheath was then reinserted into the femoral artery, at which point it was determined the leading olive from the aortic extender component had detached and remained within the distal limb of the previously implanted non-gore device.According to the report, a snare catheter was used to successfully remove the detached leading olive.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL SUNNYVALE B/P
1327 orleans drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
claire west
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key7182757
MDR Text Key97751903
Report Number2953161-2018-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/01/2020
Device Catalogue NumberPLA360400
Device Lot Number16366013
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/11/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/22/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
-
-