• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CXC4.8-3.7-35-135-P-NS-0
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/04/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a lower extremity angiogram, a flexor ansel sheath (6 fr, 45 centimeter (cm) length) was up and over the aortic bifurcation.A cook medical connors wire guide was advanced through the sheath into the patient's superficial femoral artery (sfa), and the crosscath support catheter was advanced over the wire guide to the distal sfa.The wire guide was attempted to be removed and became stuck on the catheter; the wire guide and catheter were able to be removed together.It was noted that there was a high amount of tension placed on the catheter while the wire guide was attempted to be removed.Another wire guide and catheter were then opened and advanced to the distal sfa.Following successful complete of the procedure, the crosscath support catheter hub was observed to be separated.The patient was noted to have calcified vessels.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation ¿ evaluation: a review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, quality control, specifications, and a visual inspection of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that the hub did not separate; ho hub defects were noted.9.0 mm of accordion damage was observed immediately distal to the hub of the device.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed one nonconforming event which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there was one other reported complaint for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, the reported failure mode was not detected.The complaint cannot be confirmed.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER
Type of Device
KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key7183432
MDR Text Key97109982
Report Number1820334-2018-00107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
UDI-Device Identifier00827002515819
UDI-Public(01)00827002515819(17)201004(10)8266383
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K093052
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCXC4.8-3.7-35-135-P-NS-0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/04/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/11/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/13/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/06/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/04/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-