• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0501
Device Problem Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031)
Patient Problem Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 12/21/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer reported the clip delivery system was discarded and the clip remains implanted.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.The other clip delivery system (70829u192) is filed under a separate medwatch report.
 
Event Description
This is filed for the possible leaflet damage.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4 and a flailed chord at a1/p1.The first clip delivery system (cds 70829u182) was advanced to the mitral valve.Grasping was noted to be difficult; however, a good grasp was achieved with mr reduction to 1+.After clip deployment, the mr increased to 3-4 and it was observed that a piece of the a1 leaflet was flipping up in the left atrium.It was inconclusive if the anterior leaflet was torn or if there was a poor grasp; however, because the clip was stable, it was believed that there was tissue damage.The second cds (70829u192) was advanced and grasping was attempted in multiple locations, but the mr could not be reduced.The cds was removed and the second clip was not implanted.After removal, there appeared to be a piece of chordae in the clip arms and some mr was observed at a2/p2.It was believed that this may have been caused by the clip arms.Additionally, it was noted that imaging was challenging during the procedure.The patient was confirmed to be stable post procedure, and was treated medically.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from the lot.The reported patient effects of mitral valve injury (tissue damage) as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.All available information was investigated and the reported difficulty grasping the leaflets appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology.The reported patient effect of tissue damage appears to be related to procedural circumstances of difficult grasping.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7190844
MDR Text Key97360967
Report Number2024168-2018-00376
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/17/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/29/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0501
Device Lot Number70829U182
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/21/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/15/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/17/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient Weight78
-
-