• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/19/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information references the main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id 3889-28, lot# va16y1l, implanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type lead.Date of the event was estimated.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer and health care professional regarding a patient implanted with a neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient's unit broke in half 1.5 months after it was implanted and it was clarified that it felt like it stopped working for the patient.It was stated that the patient went in and had to keep having the setting changed to get it to work but it never did.The patient was also given botox injections by the health care professional (hcp), but they were not effective either like the ins therapy had been.It was reported that the patient was also getting ankle stimulation.The caller stated that the hcp told the patient that the device should be removed if it wasn't going to help so the hcp surgically explanted the ins.It was mentioned that during surgery, the hcp found that the device was broken and it was confirmed that the patient had not fallen or anything.The caller also stated that the hcp did not want to make another incision to remove the lead at that time so the lead was left implanted because the hcp told the caller that the patient could be paralyzed if the lead was removed.Additional information was received and it was reported that the lead seemed to have separated from its insertion and tried leads as it pulled out with no effort.There were no further symptoms or complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Information references the main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id 3889-28 lot# va16y1l implanted: (b)(6)2016 product type lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.It was reported that the health care professional did not determine the cause of the lead remaining in the patient.There were no symptoms or complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7210198
MDR Text Key97943905
Report Number3004209178-2018-01124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/01/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/14/2017
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/02/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/22/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/30/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/02/2018
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-