• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3023
Device Problems Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional (1319); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 02/01/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The main component of the system and the other applicable components are: product id: 3093-28, lot# v008504, implanted: (b)(6) 2006, explanted: (b)(6) 2008, product type: lead.Product id: 3095-10, serial# (b)(4), implanted:(b)(6) 2006, explanted: (b)(6) 2008, product type: extension.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator.It was reported that, on (b)(6) 2008, pre-operative orders were signed due to a wound infection and the device was removed on (b)(6) 2008.On, or about, (b)(6) 2017, it was found that the patient had pain and a ct scan was performed.The scan showed multiple, metallic density objects, as well as possible catheter/tubing fragment in the right, lower back in the area where the device was.On, or about, (b)(6) 2017, a 1.5 inch plastic piece of fragment was removed by a healthcare professional (hcp) from the site where the device had been removed.It was claimed that the hcp was not properly instructed on the insertion of the device and, as a result, the patient was forced to undergo surgery to fix the improper placement of the device.They also stated that the hcp was not provided proper instruction on extraction of the device and, as a result, the patient was left with fragments of their device for nine years until they were extracted by another hcp.The patient had pain and suffering during the nine years they had the fragments in their body, which affected their love, companionship, and conjugal affection with their spouse.It was also noted that the patient had repeated discomfort and occasional swelling over their right, lower back, where the device was implanted, even after it was removed.They stated that the standard of care expected in pre-operative evaluation and preparation of surgical patients, operative procedures, and post-operative procedures were deviated from, causing the patient to be placed at an increased risk of retention of fragments of the device.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7231765
MDR Text Key98695534
Report Number3004209178-2018-01763
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/31/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2007
Device Model Number3023
Device Catalogue Number3023
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/22/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/31/2018
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-