• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, LONG-TERM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, LONG-TERM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number H96560M0721311
Device Problem Uncoiled (1659)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/15/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The used guidewire was returned to angiodynamics.As this is a purchased component, it has been forwarded to the supplier, heraeus medical, with a supplier corrective action request (scar).Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
After placing a midline catheter in the patient's left arm, the complaint reporter "went to remove the guidewire with the inner part of the dilator and they were both coming out and at the very end.The guidewire was floppy." it appeared to have uncoiled.The used device has been returned to angiodynamics for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history records (dhr) was performed for the indicated packaging and picc assembly component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The recent angiodynamics complaint report was reviewed for the bioflo picc product family and the failure mode "guidewire unraveled." no adverse trend was identified.As the guidewire is a purchased component for angiodynamics, the returned sample was forwarded, along with a scar (supplier corrective action request) to lake region medical components, the manufacturer.Their visual observation found that : the guidewire was unraveled beginning at the proximal weld and extending approximately 33cm distal of the proximal joint.A kink was also present in the core wire.The returned guidewire was incomplete in that the distal weld was not present on the returned guidewire and the ball weld was not present on the returned core.Lake region's conclusion was that based on the evidence presented by the sample and the information provided by the supporting documentation, improper use, improper handling, excessive force, and/or improper removal from packaging appear to have impacted on the event as reported.Lake region medical also performed a dhr review of the reported lot and found no indication of a manufacturing defect that could have impacted the reported event.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, LONG-TERM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer Contact
law ryan
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls, NY 12801
5187424488
MDR Report Key7237369
MDR Text Key98880185
Report Number1317056-2018-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device IdentifierH96560M0721311
UDI-PublicH96560M0721311
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K163452
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Catalogue NumberH96560M0721311
Device Lot Number5235439
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/18/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/15/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/02/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/29/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
-
-