• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CLEVELAND), INC. BRILLIANCE 16 AIR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CLEVELAND), INC. BRILLIANCE 16 AIR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 728246
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Degraded (1153); Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Image Display Error/Artifact (1304); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Note: we have not completed our investigation of this event.We will file a follow-up emdr at the completion of the investigation.Internal cross reference: complaint (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Engineering analysis concluded that this event has the potential to result in image misinterpretation due to an artifact from a degraded compensator within the collimator.Therefore, this issue has been determined to be a reportable event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
While on site to perform corrective maintenance for a table issue (addressed in pr8817008), the philips field service engineer (fse) found circular artifacts on scan images.The fse confirmed there was no harm to a patient and no report of misrepresentation and/or mistreatment as a result of the artifacts.The fse evaluated the system and determined a crack in the compensator of the a-plane collimator was causing the artifacts.The a-plane collimator was replaced to resolve the issue and the system was returned to the customer for clinical use.This issue was determined not to be a reportable event.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been evaluated by the manufacturer.While on site to perform corrective maintenance for a table issue (addressed in (b)(4)), the philips field service engineer (fse) found circular artifacts on scan images.The fse confirmed there was no harm to a patient and no report of misrepresentation and/or mistreatment as a result of the artifacts.The fse evaluated the system and determined a crack in the compensator of the a-plane collimator was causing the artifacts.The a-plane collimator was replaced to resolve the issue and the system was returned to the customer for clinical use.This issue was determined not to be a reportable event.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BRILLIANCE 16 AIR
Type of Device
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CLEVELAND), INC.
595 miner rd
cleveland OH 44143
Manufacturer Contact
derrick massuri
595 miner rd
cleveland, OH 44143
4404833000
MDR Report Key7249473
MDR Text Key99311323
Report Number1525965-2018-00325
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JAK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
K012009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number728246
Device Catalogue NumberNCTA399
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/02/2014
Initial Date FDA Received02/07/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/02/2014
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-