• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493932430
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 01/12/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire separation occurred.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery (rca).While advancing a comet pressure guidewire through the vessel, more than half the wire broke into two parts with one end hanging outside the aorta, and another small part breaking off.The physician was able to retrieve the part hanging outside the aorta.The smaller part was moved to the arm and placed in a small branch when it could not be removed from the body.The physician used no force during the advancement of the wire, the wire did not prolapse during the procedure, and the tip of the wire was never trapped.The procedure was not completed due to this event.The patient is stable and doing well.No future intervention is planned to remove the device fragment.
 
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire separation occurred.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery (rca).While advancing a comet pressure guidewire through the vessel, more than half the wire broke into two parts with one end hanging outside the aorta, and another small part breaking off.The physician was able to retrieve the part hanging outside the aorta.The smaller part was moved to the arm and placed in a small branch when it could not be removed from the body.The physician used no force during the advancement of the wire, the wire did not prolapse during the procedure, and the tip of the wire was never trapped.The procedure was not completed due to this event.The patient is stable and doing well.No future intervention is planned to remove the device fragment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a ffr comet wire separated in two pieces.The guidewire shaft was examined for any damage or irregularities.The proximal end of the shaft measured approximately 166.5cm.The distal end measured 9cm which is the total length of 175.5cm.The total length of a complete comet wire is 185cm.With only 175.5cm returning, a piece measuring approximately 9.5cm is missing and was not returned.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The sensor port was clear of any material.Functional testing of the device could not be completed due to the separation of the shaft.Materials testing analysis characterization (mtac) testing was performed on the returned device.The two fractures submitted for analysis are not a mating pair.One location of fracture was more distal and one location was more proximal to the device tip.The distal fracture appears to have a slight bend in the slotted tube and the proximal fracture does not.Distal fracture faces exhibit a ductile shear dimple surface which is typically observed in ductile bend overload failures.The fracture occurred at the beam connectors.Profile images of the distal fracture show the directionality of the slotted tube bend which correlates to the direction of the shear dimples observed on the fracture faces.One proximal fracture face exhibits some fatigue striations and a ductile dimple surface which is typically observed in fatigue with ductile overload as the final rupture.It is difficult to see any characteristics on what should be the other fracture face.The fracture occurred at the beam connectors.Secondary or mechanical damage is observed.No micro cracks were observed.No unusual characteristics were observed.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion was unable to be determined.Bsc id: (b)(4)/ tw# (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMET
Type of Device
TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7260132
MDR Text Key99595428
Report Number2134265-2018-00571
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSE
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/16/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/09/2019
Device Model NumberH7493932430
Device Lot Number20989582
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/23/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/16/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/09/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/28/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/26/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-