• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problem Failure to Deliver Energy (1211)
Patient Problems Incontinence (1928); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Prolapse (2475)
Event Date 05/08/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for fecal incontinence and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient experienced a loss or change in therapy.The patient stated they had the ins for bowel and still experienced accidents the same as prior to implant.They were using the programmer for the first time and was unsure how to use it.The patient wanted to increase it because they felt that the stimulation ¿needs to be stronger¿.The patient then increased the stimulation from 2.8 to 2.9.Additional information was received and it was reported that the device was not helping control the bowels, as the patient was back in the same pattern as before they got the implant.Patient would get up in the morning to go to the bathroom and would generally go 3 times and was through for the rest of the day, but sometimes it happened later.Patient had an accident and stated they had already increased stimulation due to the accident.Patient stated they did not want to increase stimulation to where they could feel it because when they urinated it felt like a ball that went 'down there'.Patient's physician told them it was just something that happened to people when they got older and took 'the ball', which patient confirmed was part of their body inside fell down, and pushed the ball back up.Additional information was received and it was reported that the therapy did not seem to be working for the patient since implant and it was not helping anything.Since a couple of months ago, the patient was not feeling stimulation, and 3 weeks ago, they tried to increase stimulation but could not feel anything at 3.4.On the day of the report, the patient had a lot of bowel movements, which was noted to be not typical for the patient.The patient would try to increase stimulation until they could feel it and if that did not work, they would try to change the program.The patient was redirected to follow up with their healthcare provider (hcp) regarding their symptoms and program change.Additional information was received and it was reported that the nurse offered to reset the stimulator to 2nd phase.The patient felt the needed to see the doctor since they had other problems caused by the implant.The patient was set on 4.2 and was taking diarrhea pills to harden bowels, hoping they would know when there bowels move.Additional information was received and it was reported that the implant caused the patient to have a pelvic organ prolapse.It was noted that they did not have any other problems that could cause it to happen.It was stated that they could let it go until it causes an infection, or they can have surgery.No further patient complications are anticipated or expected as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the consumer.It was reported the patient met with the health care physician (hcp) a couple of weeks ago and the patient was still not getting results.The patient stated they were still having bowels and the ins was not working for their symptom relief.The patient reported they didn¿t know when they were going to make a bowel and drove them ¿crazy¿.There were no further complications reported/anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7269780
MDR Text Key100041502
Report Number3004209178-2018-03277
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P080025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2018
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/25/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/14/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/19/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/22/2018
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-