• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CD HORIZON SPINAL SYSTEM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CD HORIZON SPINAL SYSTEM; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Nerve Damage (1979)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Neither the device nor applicable imaging films were returned to manufacturer for evaluation therefore we are unable to determine the definitive cause of event.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2016 the patient presented with spondylolisthesis and mild stenosis at l5-s1 and left leg weakness.The patient underwent: l5 decompressive laminectomy; interbody graft at l5-s1; pedicle screw instrumentation at the l5-s1 level.As per the op-notes, the spinous processes at l4-l5 and s1 had been exposed, the distal probe was fixed to the s1 spinous process and an o-arm scan was taken and confirmed the position.The disk space was prepared for the interbody graft using a variety of disk removal instruments.Once the disk space was thoroughly evacuated, a small bone graft was placed into the disk space and pushed over to the contralateral side.A trial 9 mm graft was put into place under o-arm guidance.A final 9 x 22 mm cage was selected and packed with foam.The graft was put into place using the mallet until the bottom of the cage was flush with the surrounding vertebral bodies.O-arm confirmed that the graft was both deep enough and extended across the mid-line.The needle was next used to cannulate the right-sided l5 pedicles through the existing incision.O-arm confirmed needle position on the upper outer pedicle edge.The needle was advanced into the vertebral body under o-arm guidance.A tap was then slid down along the same trajectory and advanced into the vertebral body.An appropriate length screw was chosen based on imaging.The tap was removed and the screw was seated into the bone.The screw was advanced until fully and firmly seated into the vertebral body as seen on ct.The screw handle was then done from the screw tower.The procedure was repeated for the remaining three pedicles, including the left-sided l5 and bilateral s1.Once the screws were in place, the rod delivery system was attached to the left-sided screw towers and an appropriately sized rod was gently moved into place down the towers and onto the screw heads.The rod tester did confirm that the rod did go through both screw heads.The rod was secured using two set screws.This process was repeated on the right side and a rod was put into place and secured with two set screws.Reportedly, intra-op, the pedicle screw was noted to have breached significantly medial to the pedicle right l5 precisely where the existing nerve roots lie.As a direct result of the misplaced pedicle screw, the patient has permanent nerve damage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CD HORIZON SPINAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK
1800 pyramid place
memphis TN 38132
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK
1800 pyramid place
memphis TN 38132
Manufacturer Contact
stacie ziemba
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
9013963133
MDR Report Key7271077
MDR Text Key100092005
Report Number1030489-2018-00212
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/14/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/16/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/14/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-