Conclusion: various factors can affect valve positioning, such as patient anatomy or the physician experience.It was reported that the valve was recaptured three times in order to re-position the valve for deployment.This is a feature of the device that allows for additional attempts at accurately positioning the valve.The cause of the suboptimal placement could not be determined with the limited information available.It was also indicated that the capsule fractured when deployed on the table outside the patient.An image of the fractured capsule was provided and confirmed the event.Capsule damage or separation is typically related to a misloaded valve or other source of forces created on the system, which is then exacerbated during tracking or deployment.However, without review of fluoroscopic load check and/or procedural imaging, the quality of the valve loading process could not be assessed, and an assignable root cause cannot be determined.The lot history was reviewed and showed; there were no correlations / issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Medtronic received information that during the implant of a transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, three attempts were made to properly position the valve.The valve was recaptured each time and the device was withdrawn from the body.Upon attempting to deploy the valve on the back table, the capsule fractured.A different valve was loaded into another dcs and was successfully implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|