• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Break (1069); High impedance (1291); Unintended Collision (1429); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Electric Shock (2554); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id: 388928, lot# 0209608489, implanted: (b)(6) 2015, explanted: (b)(6)2018, product type: lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information received from a healthcare professional (hcp) via a manufacturer representative reported a lead fracture.A consumer fell while running and reported that when he got home, he experienced jolting stimulation that cut in and out with position change.An impedance test was run, and all electrodes were > 4000 ohms.The lead and implantable neurostimulator (ins) were both replaced.It was noted that the ins was not related to the event, but was replaced as the hcp did not want to replace a flat battery in the next 12 months.Troubleshooting noted that a battery test was done.During explant of the lead, the tip of the electrode broke off, and it was noted that it may have already been broken.The issue was resolved.There were no further complications reported and/or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the lead, model 3889-28, found all conductors were broken in the body of the lead; 23.2 cm from the proximal end of the lead.During visual analysis of the lead, it was noted the distal end was not returned.Analysis identified markings on the outer insulation of the lead which is consistent with markings from the use of a tool.The ins output was tested through the returned ins to broken lead.Good stable output was observed on all electrode pairs the ins had when it was received.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported the tip was left in as too difficult to remove and there were no plans to retrieve it.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7288054
MDR Text Key100643039
Report Number3004209178-2018-03740
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign,health profe
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2016
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/09/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/16/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/21/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/07/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/21/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-