Updated: device evaluated by mfr., eval summary attached, method codes, results codes, conclusion codes.Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a ffr comet wire separated in two pieces.The guidewire shaft was examined for any damage or irregularities.It was noticed that the device was separated when returned.The proximal end of the shaft measured 153cm.The distal end measured 32cm which is the total length of 185cm.It was also noticed that there were 2 slight kinks on the shaft.The 1st kink was located at 8.5cm from the proximal end of the guidewire and the 2nd kink was located at 122cm from the proximal end of the guidewire.There was some coating that had also scrapped off at the 122cm location.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The sensor port was clear of any material.Functional testing of the device could not be completed due to the separation of the shaft.Mtac testing was performed on the returned device.Coating material was present in slots in rows 1 thru 7 adjacent to the distal and proximal fracture ends.No micro-cracks were observed at apex of slots in rows 1 thru 7 adjacent to the distal and proximal fracture ends.The fracture surfaces showed the presence of dimples and discernible directional bend.This indicates the fracture mode was a ductile bend overload.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion was unable to be determined.(b)(4).
|