Several attempts were made to get more information regarding the incident.The incident is being reported as an adverse event since the mucosa was perforated, exposing the mpq, which may have let to the stone formation.At this point, we are considering the removal of the stone to be medical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or reforming bladder stones.
|
Female patient who presented with urinary incontinence was initially treated via pubovaginal sling in 2005.In (b)(6) 2013, patient was given a suburethral injection of macroplastique (mpq) with good results and follow up through 2014.In (b)(6) 2017, the patient was referred back to her doctor for possible bladder stones - the patient reported mild bladder irritability and minor recurrent stress urinary incontinence (sui).The patient was found to have mucosa which had perforated exposing the mpq implant, and also had a bladder stone which developed on top of the exposed mpq implant.The patient underwent a cystolitholapaxy in (b)(6) 2017 to remove the bladder stones.It is unclear if the mpq implant was removed, or if other treatment was provided.
|