• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0501
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528); Incomplete Coaptation (2507); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 02/13/2018
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer reported the clip delivery system was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The other two mitraclips (70828u115, 70905u163) are filed under separate medwatch report numbers.
 
Event Description
This is filed to report the complete clip detachment with clip delivery system (cds 71027u246).It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The first cds (70828u115) was advanced to the left atrium; however, while dropping the grippers, there were more micro bubbles present than expected.The cds was removed and replaced.The next cds (70905u163) was advanced to the mitral valve and the clip was deployed.The final cds (71027u246) was advanced to the mitral valve.Grasping was performed.While establishing gripper line removability, it was note that the gripper line felt tight.Deployment was continued.After 6 inches of the gripper line was removed, it was observed that the clip changed orientation on the valve.It was then found that the clip had detached from the posterior leaflet and remained attached to the anterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda) and a new flail was present.The gripper line continued to be removed; however, the clip detached from the anterior leaflet (complete clip detachment/ccd).The cds was pulled into the guide, and the clip was retracted with the gripper line, but could not be retracted into the mouth of the guide.The system was retracted to the right atrium.The first implanted clip then detached from the posterior leaflet and remained attached to the anterior leaflet (slda).The mr returned to 4.The devices were left in the anatomy and the patient was sent to mitral valve replacement surgery.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient died.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.The reported patient effects of tissue damage and death, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.This event was further reviewed by an abbott vascular medical affairs director who concluded that the death was likely a complication of surgery and was not directly related to the device.The mitraclip nt instructions for use (ifu) states: if excessive resistance is noted at both ends of the gripper line (resulting in failure to establish gripper line removability (eglr)), stop and remove the clip delivery system.As the clip was deployed despite an unsuccessful eglr test, the use deviation contributed to the partial clip movement, single leaflet device attachment (slda) and subsequent complete clip detachment (ccd).All available information was investigated and the partial clip movement, slda and ccd appear to be a result of patient morphology/pathology and with the user continuing to deploy the clip and attempting to remove the gripper line when eglr was not performed successfully.A definitive cause for the reported difficulty to remove the gripper line could not be determined.The procedural conditions of ccd resulted in the clip unable to be retracted into the guide and thus the cds was difficult to remove from the sgc.The reported tissue damage appears to be due to the slda.A definitive cause for the reported death however, could not be determined.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7325920
MDR Text Key101950314
Report Number2024168-2018-01684
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0501
Device Lot Number71027U246
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/13/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/08/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/23/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/29/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight37
-
-