Details of the complaint.On 02/12/18, customer at (b)(6) hospital reported the transmitter (zm-520pa sn: (b)(6)) shocked a patient through the ecg electrodes.Monitoring was discontinued and no clinical action was taken at the hospital.There was no patient injury.Service requested exchange.Service performed exchange.Investigation result.Per nkc dhr, the unit has had no history of ncmr, deviation, or capa during manufacturing of the device.The device has not been refurbished and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings before device release that might relate to the reported issue.Review of device c4c history found no other issue reported for this unit after release to the customer.The bme at the facility tested the unit and was unable to reproduce the issue.The bme had no previous service history on the device that may be related to the symptom or incident.Evaluation of the unit at nka by repair center technician was also unable to duplicate the issue.The zm-520 and zm-530 series telemetry transmitter is an internally powered equipment which operates on two aa (lr6) type alkaline dry cell primary batteries.The rated voltage is 3.0 v, and the operating voltage is 1.4 - 3.2 v.Per nka clinical assessment, risk of potential harm is low due to the unit being a low voltage device.Additionally, ecg and impedance method respiration for the transmitter was designed for protection against electrical shock with the use of defibrillation-proof type cf applied part, and spo2 was designed with the use of defibrillation-proof type bf applied part.This is in compliance with safety standard iec 60601-1.Analysis of complaints created against the zm-520 and zm-530 series transmitters for "shock" issue revealed the following: ticket notification number created on model serial (b)(6) 300113578 (b)(6) 2018 zm-520pa 2135 (current ticket); (b)(6) 300115103 (b)(6) 2018 zm-521pa 2781 patient shocked by leads; (b)(6) 300115103 (b)(6) 2020 zm-521pa 2900 transmitter may have shocked a patient.In all 3 cases, no patient injury has resulted due to the reported shock.The devices were tested at the respective hospitals and the issue could not be reproduced.The total number of zm-520 and zm-530 devices in distribution is over 20.The complaint rate for the "shock" issue is less than 0.1%.From the information available, and as the reported issue could not be duplicated upon evaluation of the device, the root cause could not be determined.No adverse trend is suspected for this issue.Investigation conclusion.From the information available, and as the reported issue could not be duplicated upon evaluation of the device, the root cause could not be determined.No adverse trend is suspected for this issue.Correction: f9.Approximate age of device: incorrectly calcuated.Additional information: b4.Date of this report; d10.Device available for evaluation?; e2-3.Initial reporter - occupation; f6.Date user facility/importer became aware of the event; f7.Type of report; f11.Date report sent to fda; f13.Date report sent to manufacturer; g4.Date received by manufacturer; g7.Type of report; h2.If follow-up, what type?; additional information; correction; device evaluation; h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer?; h6.Event problem and evaluation codes; h10.Additional manufacturer narrative.
|