• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/07/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).(b)(4).Investigation results a visual evaluation of the returned rx cytology brush revealed that the pull wire was broken at the distal end of handle cannula, and it was also noticed that a kink was found in the same location.The extrusion is free from obvious kinks and bends.Further evaluation noted that the bristled portion of the brush was cut by the customer with a sharp tool.A functional analysis was not performed due to the condition of the returned device.It is most likely that the pull wire being kinked at the distal end of the handle cannula could have caused difficulty to extend/ retract the brush.Due to excessive manipulation of the device, it would cause the pull wire to break.Based on all gathered information, the most probable cause of this complaint is ¿manufacturing process design¿, since it is most likely that design or validation of the manufacturing process was not sufficient to ensure the finished device met the intent of the design.There is an investigation in place to address this issue.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and no deviations were found.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the brush was difficult to extend and retract.The procedure was completed with this device.There was ¿no serious injury¿ reported as a result of this event.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.This event has been deemed a mdr reportable event based on the investigation results; wire broke.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key7342066
MDR Text Key102592816
Report Number3005099803-2018-00795
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729268628
UDI-Public08714729268628
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/07/2019
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number21482135
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/14/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age35 YR
-
-