• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Connection Problem (2900); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/09/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) 2018 (b)(4) (rep): information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator (ins) for gastrointestinal/pelvic floor and urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim.It was reported that when the manufacturer representative tested impedance during the implant procedure they got ¿??? or it blacked out;¿ the impedance check ¿were blacked out.¿ it was noted that they increased the impedance test to 2 volts and 360 pulse width.It was also reported that the healthcare provider unscrewed the setscrew to pull the lead out and reinsert, but the setscrew was lost.It was clarified that device issue was with both the ins and setscrew but the cause was unknown, and that the setscrew was not lost, it just would not tighten.Another ins was used to finish the implant.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.It was reported that the screw was not seated correctly in the device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis determined that the setscrew of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was backed out beyond the point of being able to engage with the connector block and was cross-threaded.An attempt was made and was successful to screw the setscrew back into place and functional testing was performed.Was able to get good stable output on all circuits with known good lead.An impedance in saline test was performed and normal impedances were measured on all circuits and electrode pair combinations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7349326
MDR Text Key102851163
Report Number3004209178-2018-05279
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2019
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/26/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/19/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/26/2018
05/03/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/27/2018
05/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/07/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
-
-