• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Computer Operating System Problem (2898); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/27/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A patient's generator could not be interrogated during a recent clinic visit.The patient's generator was implanted approximately 1.5 years prior to the clinic visit.A company representative was called, and 6 different programming systems were used to attempt an interrogation of the patient's generator; however, the generator still would not communicate.The programming systems could interrogate other generators in the same room.The patient's generator was easily palpable in the patient's thin chest, and interrogation was attempted at 0 and 1 inches from the generator.The patient was noted to beat on his generator, but it was unknown if this contributed to damage of the generator.Clinic notes reported that there were no indications of an end of service condition of the generator, as the patient coughed during a generator reset, and cleared his throat when the vns magnet was swiped over the generator.The physician believed that the patient was experiencing a firmware issue with the generator and referred the patient for generator replacement surgery.The nurse reported that the patient had not been seen by the physician's office for nearly 1 year, so the physician was concerned about the function of the patient's device.The nurse reported that the patient did not have medical procedures within the last year that required the use of electrocautery or similar surgical tools that could have come into contact with the generator and caused an unexpected discharge of battery.The nurse mentioned that there were no other explanations for the failure to interrogate besides the trauma the patient had inflicted on the device, but the medical staff was not sure that was truly the cause of the generator issues.A battery life calculation estimated 5.2 years life remaining until near end of service.Programming history was reviewed for the patient's generator and did not display evidence of premature battery depletion or any other abnormal conditions with the generator.The device history records were reviewed for the generator and revealed that the generator met all functional specifications prior to release for distribution.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent generator replacement surgery due to the failure to interrogate the generator.The explanted generator was received by the manufacturer for analysis, but analysis has not been approved for the device to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The company representative reported that the patient had always beat his chest incredibly hard on both the left and right sides, even prior to vns implantation.Analysis was approved for the returned pulse generator.The generator would not interrogate as received.Electrical testing and system diagnostics could not be performed due to the inability to interrogate the generator.A visual assessment of the internal circuitry identified that the negative battery voltage measurement post was dislodged from the battery and the circuit board.All of the filter feedthru wires were broken.A review of the manufacturing x-ray showed that the filter feedthru wires were connected appropriately at manufacturing.The manufacturer's logo on the battery component was observed to be atypically imprinted on the generator can insulator.The internal circuitry had rubbed on the battery case.Once the internal circuitry was connected to a bench power supply, the data could be downloaded; however, the data was corrupted due to the loss of the negative battery voltage measurement post.High impedance values were present in the data.Microscopy of the negative battery voltage measurement terminal suggested a stress-induced fracture occurred at the weld location.The exact fracture mechanism could not be ascertained.The force with which the patient struck his chest contributed to the extensive damage sustained by the pulse generator.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7376480
MDR Text Key103682696
Report Number1644487-2018-00472
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
UDI-Device Identifier05425025750061
UDI-Public05425025750061
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/18/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/13/2018
Device Model Number106
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/05/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/02/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/28/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/28/2018
04/20/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/19/2018
05/18/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age11 YR
-
-