• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. BD SERO-FUGE¿ 2002 CENTRIFUGE, 2 SPEED, 115V

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. BD SERO-FUGE¿ 2002 CENTRIFUGE, 2 SPEED, 115V Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 420352
Device Problem Self-Activation or Keying (1557)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 03/05/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a bd sero-fuge¿ 2002 centrifuge, 2 speed, 115v continued to run when the lid was open.No injury or medical intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: complaint was confirmed.The centrifuge was returned to bd for investigation of the safety spins w/lid open complaint.Customer reported an out of warranty centrifuge spins while the lid is open.The customer confirmed the receipt and proper operation of the replacement.The observations from manufacturing engineering were: instrument shows signs of moderate use.Evidence of some liquid spills that leaked into the latch mechanism.Some customer tampering with the lid latch was evident.A piece of foam tape was applied to the top of the latching mechanism for an unknown reason.Lid latch mechanism was found to be sticky and got hung up but centrifuge would not spin unless the lid is closed and latched.It was noted that the latch mechanism could be defeated if the latch hook was bent slightly.In this scenario the operator would have noticed that the lid was not fully closed or latched and should not have tried to initiate a spin cycle.Investigation conclusion: based on returns investigation, the cause can be attributed to but not limited to wear due to liquid spill and tampering by the customer.As received the centrifuge operated correctly even though the latch mechanism was somewhat impaired and in need of replacement.The dhr was unable to be retrieved.The service history was reviewed for this instrument and no issues were identified.Root cause description: assignable cause include wear due to liquid spill and customer tampering with lid mechanism.Rationale: the complaint trend for safety has not reached an actionable level for the march 2018.Two safety complaints were reported for the month.Cat 4 safety complaints default at a/a levels of 2 and 3 respectively within a 6 month trending period.The customer received an foc replacement as a resolution.Quality has initiated capa (b)(4) for further investigation intended to drive a corrective action for this trend.Quality will continue to monitor trends relative to the safety cat 4 code for this instrument.These complaints are captured in the risk management file, (b)(4).No new hazards have been identified and no hazards have changed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a bd sero-fuge¿ 2002 centrifuge, 2 speed, 115v continued to run when the lid was open.No injury or medical intervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD SERO-FUGE¿ 2002 CENTRIFUGE, 2 SPEED, 115V
Type of Device
CENTRIFUGE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO.
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO.
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
brett wilko
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015652845
MDR Report Key7387318
MDR Text Key104157562
Report Number1119779-2018-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other,user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number420352
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/05/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/30/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/05/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/09/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/05/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-