• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; VELA SUPRARENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; VELA SUPRARENAL Back to Search Results
Model Number A28-28/C95-O20V
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 12/26/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information received at the completion of the clinical evaluation, there were substantial reported evidence that supported the following case event.In addition to the confirmed type 3a endoleak, component separation, and sac growth (reference 2031527-2018-00005), clinical was also able to confirm a cuff migration (20mm) and dilation of the stent graft and superior stent margin of the main body.A secondary procedure of a re-line was performed on (b)(6) 2018 to correct the issues.Cumulative knowledge informed by past assessments of similar complaints was applied to a review of the available medical information.The most likely cause of the cuff migration was the off-label neck anatomy at the initial implant procedure.The most likely cause of the mid aortic loss of seal with complete component separation and loss of overlap of the main body and the cuff was the aortic remodeling caused by the migration.The most likely cause of the compromised stent graft integrity (stretched) of the main body (24%) and the cuff (36%) could not be determined, but it was likely the eventual loss of overlap contributed to this event.To date there has been no reports of further negative patient sequelae.A review of the manufacturing lot confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.The devices remain implanted in the patient and will not returned and no evaluation will be completed.These types of events will be monitored and trended as part of the quality system.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017, endologix was notified of a reported patient with a large type 3a endoleak with a noted aortic extension separation from the bifurcated main body device.Patient also was noted to have a aaa enlargement.Initial implant of the afx was done on (b)(6) 2015.On (b)(6) 2018, a successful re-line was done on patient with two (2) vela extensions placed to "bridge" the prior separated aortic extension.In addition, clincial noted on their final evaluation, that patient also had a cuff migration (20mm) and stent cage dilation (36%).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
VELA SUPRARENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
victor arellano
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984671
MDR Report Key7390495
MDR Text Key104132290
Report Number2031527-2018-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00818009013637
UDI-Public(01)00818009013637
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/23/2015
Device Model NumberA28-28/C95-O20V
Device Catalogue NumberF00786-09
Device Lot Number1269249024
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/28/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/02/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/08/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
-
-