(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the clip was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
This is filed to report damage to the leaflet.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 3.Two clips (lots 80119u187, 71113u257) were placed successfully.A third clip delivery system (cds 80119u188) was advanced; however, due to large calcification, it was not possible to grasp the leaflets.The cds was retracted to the left atrium (la); however, the posterior leaflet became torn (flail).The cds was removed and the procedure was discontinued.The mr remained at 3.The next day, a second procedure was performed to treat the flail with an occluder.During placement of the occluder, the first implanted clip detached from the anterior leaflet and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda).A new cds (80124u207) was advanced to the left ventricle (lv).While retracting the gripper lever, the gripper line broke.It was not possible to retract the clip into the la due to the lowered grippers; therefore, the clip was deployed.After deployment, it was confirmed that the clip was not attached to the leaflets and remained on the gripper line.The steerable guide catheter (sgc) was positioned above the detached clip, and the clip was pulled to the tip of the sgc.While retracting with the gripper line, the clip stuck on the septum.A snare was advanced, and the clip was retrieved successfully from the anatomy.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not identify similar incidents reported from this lot.All available information was investigated and the reported failure to adhere or bond (grasping/capture) appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology (calcified leaflets).Additionally, the reported patient effects of tissue damage was related to procedural circumstances as the cds interacted with the posterior leaflet while retracting the device to left atrium.The reported patient effect of mitral valve injury (tissue damage), as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|