• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0502
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problem Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 03/07/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).(b)(6).The clip remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
This report is filed for partial clip movement/ potential single leaflet device attachment post deployment.It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed treating functional mitral regurgitation grade 4, with mildly calcified leaflets.One mitraclip was implanted without reported issue.A second mitraclip (cds 71106u144) was advanced to the mitral valve and, before implantation, the clip arms were slightly clockwise from perpendicular to the line of coaptation.This mitraclip was implanted close to the posterior 2 (p2) and posterior 1 (p1) indentation with reported sufficient leaflet capture.Post deployment, movement of the posterior leaflet was observed in some views.No treatment was provided and the mr had been reduced to grade 1-2.During a routine echocardiogram two days following, increased mr was observed.Additional imaging was performed the following day showing the second clip had possibly detached from the posterior 2 (p2) leaflet, while remaining attached to the anterior 2 (a2) leaflet (single leaflet device attachment-slda).No intervention has been performed and the patient will be medically observed.There was no additional information provided regarding this issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.It should be noted that the reported patient effects of worsening mitral regurgitation (mr), as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu), is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.All available information was investigated and a definitive cause for the reported partial clip movement on the leaflet and ingle leaflet device attachment (slda) in this incident could not be determined.It is possible to be related to patient conditions (calcified leaflets and procedural circumstances), however, this cannot be confirmed.The reported worsening mr was likely related to procedural conditions and due to the movement/detachment of the clip from the leaflet.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7399900
MDR Text Key104522405
Report Number2024168-2018-02507
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/06/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0502
Device Lot Number71106U144
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/07/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/05/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-