• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209); Energy Output Problem (1431); Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Swelling (2091); Burning Sensation (2146)
Event Date 04/05/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer via a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for non-malignant pain.It was reported that the implant site felt hot and it was also from the middle of their back down to their groin.This occurred the day before the report (b)(6) 2018.The therapy was turned on earlier yesterday but they felt it later in the evening.It was reported that the patient did not appear to have symptoms when therapy was off.Impedances were not checked at the time of the report.The manufacturer representative was going to meet with the patient next monday to check the system.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative on (b)(6) 2018 when they were with the patient.Impedances were fine with a range around 780-1350 ohms while checking different reference electrodes.The patient did sometimes fell stimulation when the ins was off.The ins started feeling hot after it had been on for about 30 minutes.This was confirmed in the office when the ins had been on for about 25 minutes when the manufacturer representative had to turn the ins off since the patient began to feel the sensation.When the ins was turned on, the patient felt stimulation appropriately.The patient indicated that the sensation felt like post-op pain from when the ins was first replaced.The patient had not noticed any redness or swelling at the ins site beyond swelling right after replacement.The incision was examined by the hcp last thursday and no issues were said to be found.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative on 2018-apr-11 reporting that the patient turned stimulation off once they could no longer tolerate the sensation at the battery site.The cause had not been determined at this time.The patient would be making an appointment in the future with the manufacturer representative.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient via manufacturer's representative.It was reported patient felt burning sensation at stimulator pocket site and got very hot when patient turned ins on.It was reported the burning sensation started increasing 10 minutes after ins was on.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) reporting that the rep was unsure at this time if any further actions/interventions would be taken to resolve the patient¿s burning sensation at the ins site.The patient was rescheduling to see their healthcare provider (hcp) to discuss this, but the appointment date was unknown at this time.It was indicated that the provided information had been confirmed with the physician.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7420299
MDR Text Key105374951
Report Number3004209178-2018-07754
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/14/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/06/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/10/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/11/2018
10/16/2018
10/24/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/19/2018
10/18/2018
11/05/2018
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
-
-