Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information of conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
This follow-up mdr is created to document the conclusion of the evaluation.Requests for the explanted prosthesis and for additional information surrounding this event have been made.Quality reviewed the manufacturing records for this device and confirmed that there were no discrepancies that would have contributed to this complaint and verified that the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.Review of nonconformances revealed no nonconformance with this lot that would have contributed to the event.Based on this knowledge, quality concludes that the erosion originated from source(s) other than the device.Without the benefit of analyzing the explant, quality cannot confirm any observations and cannot comment on the condition of the prosthesis.If the explanted device becomes available, or additional information is received, quality will re-evaluate this complaint in accordance to procedures.Management routinely reviews events such as this and monitors complaint levels.Additionally, events of this type are captured in the product risk documentation.Based on this information, no further corrective action is required at this time.
|