• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. IMPRA EPTFE VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. IMPRA EPTFE VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number 40S06
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Thrombosis (2100); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 09/02/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.The device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.A review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.The device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.A review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately four months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis and stenosis of vascular access.Approximately one year two months post vascular graft placement the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access, was hospitalized, and a central venous catheter was placed.Reportedly, thrombectomy and angioplasty procedures were performed and the catheter was removed.The patient was discharged approximately one week post admission.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately four months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis and stenosis of vascular access.Approximately one year two months post vascular graft placement the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access, was hospitalized, and a central venous catheter was placed.Reportedly, thrombectomy and angioplasty procedures were performed and the catheter was removed.The patient was discharged approximately one week post admission.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPRA EPTFE VASCULAR GRAFT
Type of Device
EPTFE VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
MDR Report Key7430114
MDR Text Key105443194
Report Number2020394-2018-00388
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
UDI-Device Identifier00801741021831
UDI-Public(01)00801741021831
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K004011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,s
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/19/2021
Device Model Number40S06
Device Catalogue Number40S06
Device Lot NumberVTAN0526
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/26/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/13/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/17/2018
09/12/2018
10/01/2018
02/07/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/15/2018
10/08/2018
10/29/2018
02/12/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID, ENOXAPARIN SODIUM; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE, ASA; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE, ASA; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE, ASA; CLONIDINE, BISOPROLOL, FUROSEMIDE, ASA
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient Weight82
-
-