|
Model Number 40S06 |
Device Problems
Occlusion Within Device (1423); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); Thrombosis (2100); Stenosis (2263)
|
Event Date 09/02/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.The device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.A review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.The device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.A review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately four months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis and stenosis of vascular access.Approximately one year two months post vascular graft placement the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access, was hospitalized, and a central venous catheter was placed.Reportedly, thrombectomy and angioplasty procedures were performed and the catheter was removed.The patient was discharged approximately one week post admission.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately ten months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and a central venous catheter was inserted for hemodialysis access.It was further reported that the patient admitted to the hospital approximately one week later.Reportedly, a thrombectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was successfully performed in the venous anastomosis and the patient discharged on hospital day two.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and three months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, a thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were successfully performed.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately one year and five months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced infection of vascular access and was admitted to the hospital.Reportedly, an operation was performed and part of the study conduit was removed.The current patient status is unknown.New information: it was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately four months post placement of a right upper arm vascular graft, the patient experienced thrombosis and stenosis of vascular access.Approximately one year two months post vascular graft placement the patient experienced thrombosis of vascular access, was hospitalized, and a central venous catheter was placed.Reportedly, thrombectomy and angioplasty procedures were performed and the catheter was removed.The patient was discharged approximately one week post admission.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|