Model Number CNS-6201A |
Device Problems
Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings (1126); Device Issue (2379); Human Factors Issue (2948)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/20/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The nurse reported that there was a discrepancy between the readings from the bedside monitor (bsm) and the central nurse's station (cns).The bsm waveform looked different than the waveform on the cns when the sensitivity was set the same on both.They also reported that they are experiencing alarm fatigue because their desired default settings were reverting to the previous settings.Nihon kohden clinical application specialist (cas) was on site providing clinical optimization.She found that the customer did not set the defaults correctly and that she has made the correct changes to the bsm, which resolved the issue.No patient harm was reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
The nurse reported that there was a discrepancy between the readings from the bedside monitor (bsm) and the central nurse's station (cns).The bsm waveform looked different than the waveform on the cns when the sensitivity was set the same on both.They also reported that they are experiencing alarm fatigue because their desired default settings were reverting to the previous settings.
|
|
Event Description
|
The nurse reported that there was a discrepancy between the readings from the bedside monitor (bsm) and the central nurse's station (cns).The bsm waveform looked different than the waveform on the cns when the sensitivity was set the same on both.They also reported that they are experiencing alarm fatigue because their desired default settings were reverting to the previous settings.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional narrative: on (b)(6) 2018, (b)(6) at (b)(6) hospital reported issues with alarm fatigue and waveform reading discrepancies on the cns-6201a (pu-621ra sn: (b)(6) and bsms.Service requested: troubleshooting/assistance.Service performed: onsite clinical support found the default settings to not be set correctly.The correct changes were made to the bsm.Investigation result: the device warranty began 03/30/2017, which is 1 year prior to reported issue.The root cause is determined to be user error/education needed.There were incorrect settings on the device which led to discrepancies in the waveform and alarm limits.Issue was resolved with assistance of clinical support in correcting default settings.The device was in use with a patient and there was no reported patient harm.Based on the given information, this complaint record will be closed corrected information: g4.Date received by manufacturer: should be 03/20/2018 not 04/18/2018 as listed on mdr initial report.Additional information: b4.Date of this report.D11& c2 concomitant medical products.F6.Date user facility/importer became aware of the event.F7.Type of report.F11.Date report sent to fda.F13.Date report sent to manufacturer.G4.Date received by manufacturer.G7.Type of report.H2.If follow-up, what type? additional information.Correction.H6.Event problem and evaluation codes.H10.Additional manufacturer narrative.D11& c2 concomitant medical products: bedside monitor (model/serial unknown).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|