BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER UPHOLD¿ LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M0068318170 |
Device Problem
Misfire (2532)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The exact age of the patient is unknown.However, it was reported the patient was over 18 years.The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold¿ lite with capio slim was used during a anterior repair procedure performed.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device had a misfire.The procedure was completed with another uphold¿ lite with capio slim.All other information is unknown.Should additional relevant details become available; a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold¿ lite with capio slim was used during a anterior repair procedure performed.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device had a misfire.The procedure was completed with another uphold¿ lite with capio slim.All other information is unknown.Should additional relevant details become available; a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An examination of the returned device revealed that there was no damage to the capio slim suture capturing device and it functioned as intended.The mesh assembly was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets the design and manufacture specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance of the device was limited.The most probable root cause classification is operational context.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|